![]() |

![]()
Coming Clean
By BETSY MCCAUGHEY
Published:
INFECTIONS that
have been nearly eradicated in some other countries are raging through
hospitals here in the
And the danger is
worsening as many hospital infections can no longer be cured with common
antibiotics. One of the deadliest germs is a staph
bacteria called M.R.S.A., short for methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus, which lives harmlessly on the
skin but causes havoc when it enters the body. Patients who do survive M.R.S.A.
often spend months in the hospital and endure several operations to cut out
infected tissue. In 1974, 2 percent of staph
infections were from M.R.S.A. By 1995, that number had soared to 22 percent.
Today, experts estimate that more than 60 percent of staph
infections are M.R.S.A.
Hospitals in
Too few hospitals
in the
More than half the
time, doctors and other caregivers break the most fundamental rule of hygiene
by failing to clean their hands before treating a patient. Gloves are not the
answer because pulling them on with dirty hands contaminates the gloves.
Nearly
three-quarters of patients' rooms are contaminated with M.R.S.A., which,
according to experts, can be found on everything from cabinets to bedside
tables. Once patients and caregivers touch these surfaces,
their hands become vectors for disease. Ordinary cleaning solutions can
kill these bugs, but surfaces need to be drenched in disinfectant for several
minutes, not just sprayed and wiped quickly.
Frequently,
stethoscopes, blood-pressure monitors and other equipment are contaminated with
live bacteria. Yet doctors and nurses almost never clean the stethoscope before
listening to a patient's chest.
Astoundingly, most
hospitals in the
Clothing is
frequently a conveyor belt for infections. When doctors and nurses lean over a
patient with M.R.S.A., their coats and uniforms pick up bacteria 65 percent of
the time, and carry it to other patients.
Contaminated
clothing is believed to be the culprit at
Hospital
infections can be stopped, but most hospital administrators have not made
prevention a top priority. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are
also to blame. While the C.D.C. has made some efforts to curb hospital
infections, they have failed to ask hospitals to follow the rigorous precautions
that are working in other countries and in those American hospitals where they
have been tried.
In 2003, a task
force for the Society of Healthcare Epidemiologists of America chastised the
C.D.C. for this failure, but the C.D.C. has still not acted. Every year of
delay is costing thousands of lives.
Many hospital
administrators say they can't afford to take the necessary precautions, but
they can't afford not to. Infections erode hospital profits because rarely are
hospitals fully paid for the added weeks or months that patients must spend in
the hospital when they get an infection. Studies show that when hospitals
invest in these proven precautions, they are rewarded with as much as tenfold
financial return. These infections add about $30 billion annually to the
nation's health costs. This tab will increase rapidly as more infections become
drug-resistant.
In February, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared that it will not support
the growing demand to make hospital infection rates public. That's a shame
because if you need to be hospitalized, you should be able to find out which
hospitals in your area have the worst infection problems. This secrecy may
allow some hospitals to save face, but it won't save lives or money.
Betsy
McCaughey, a former lieutenant governor of New York, is the founder of the
Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths.
![]() |